
Quick Answer
A commercial survey maps boundaries, improvements, easements, and encroachments against the legal description. Common problems include structures crossing property lines, easements running through planned building areas, and access that does not exist where everyone assumed.
The title report tells you what rights exist. Only the survey tells you where they are.
Title review and survey answer different halves of the same question. A recorded easement described as running along the eastern boundary means nothing until someone establishes where the eastern boundary is and what sits on it. ALTA survey requirements exist because commercial transactions need that second half in a standardized, reliable form.
We handle these matters for growth-stage companies in Idaho and California. This is general information — not legal or tax advice on a specific situation.
Title reviewed, survey skipped
Buyer reads the exceptions and never locates them physically, then discovers a conflict after closing.
Overlay survey and title exceptions
Plot every recorded right on a current survey and test it against the intended use.
A site with no surprises
Boundaries, access, and buildable area confirmed before the deposit hardens.
Half the diligence is in the record. The other half is on the ground.
What a commercial survey shows
An ALTA NSPS survey is the standard for commercial transactions. It shows boundaries against the legal description, the location of improvements, recorded easements plotted on the ground, encroachments in either direction, access to public rights of way, and flood zone designation.
Optional table items add detail — zoning setbacks, parking counts, utility locations, wetlands. Which to order depends on the property and the intended use, and the list should be settled with counsel and the lender rather than left to the surveyor’s default.
Order the optional items your use actually depends on.
Reading an ALTA NSPS survey
Reading an ALTA NSPS survey starts with the surveyor’s certification, which states the standards followed and who may rely on it. Reliance matters: a survey certified only to the seller may not be relied on by the buyer or its lender.
Then work through the plotted exceptions. Each recorded easement should be shown with a reference to its recording information, and any exception the surveyor could not plot should be noted. Unplottable exceptions deserve attention, since they are often the vaguely described ones.
The exceptions the surveyor could not plot are the vague ones.
Encroachments
Encroachment found before closing is the most common survey issue: a neighbor’s fence, driveway, or building corner over the line, or the subject property’s improvements over onto adjoining land.
Resolution options include a boundary line agreement, an easement legitimizing the condition, removal, or affirmative title insurance coverage over the specific encroachment. Which is appropriate depends on materiality — a fence six inches over is not a wall six feet over.
A fence over the line is not a building over the line.
Boundary disputes
A boundary line dispute commercial property can arise where deed descriptions conflict, where monuments have been lost, or where long occupation has established a line different from the record.
Doctrines including adverse possession, acquiescence, and boundary by agreement can move a legal boundary away from the recorded description. A survey identifying occupation inconsistent with the record is a signal to investigate before closing, not a technicality to note and pass over.
Long occupation can move a boundary the deed never moved.
Survey exceptions and title insurance
Survey exception title insurance is the standard exclusion for matters an accurate survey would disclose. Providing a current survey acceptable to the title company usually allows that general exception to be deleted, replaced by specific exceptions for identified conditions.
That trade is what makes the survey worth its cost. Without it the policy excludes an entire category of risk; with it, the buyer knows precisely which conditions remain uninsured.
The survey converts a blanket exclusion into a known list.
Timing and lender requirements
Commission the survey at the start of diligence. Fieldwork, drafting, and revisions take weeks, and any issue found needs time to resolve within the objection and cure periods the purchase agreement provides.
Lenders have their own requirements — specific certification language, particular optional items, and certification naming the lender. Confirm those early rather than reordering later. Recorded interests follow Title 55, lender practice reflects FDIC guidance, and where contamination is a factor EPA standards apply alongside.
Confirm the lender’s survey requirements before you order it.
A simple plan to get a legal partner in your corner
Owners who bring in commercial lease review attorney early almost always pay less than those who call one afterward.
Book your free legal-strategy call
We assess the situation, map a clear path forward, and discuss costs upfront.
Have a legal partner in your corner
We handle the drafting, the negotiation, and the risk, so you always know where you stand.
Enjoy real peace of mind
With the legal side handled, you focus on running the business.
The engagement at a glance
A three-step path from first call to ongoing protection.
Survey turned up something unexpected?
Book a free call. We’ll work out whether it’s a note, a negotiation, or a reason to walk.
Book Your Free Legal-Strategy CallOr call 855-208-2049Frequently asked questions
What is an ALTA survey?
Why do I need a survey if I have a title report?
What is an encroachment?
How are encroachments resolved?
What is the survey exception in a title policy?
How long does a commercial survey take?
Can I rely on the seller’s existing survey?
What are ALTA optional table items?
What if the survey shows a boundary dispute?
How can Clark Meyers help?
Sources
- Idaho Legislature — Title 55, Property in General. legislature.idaho.gov
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation — Resources for Bankers. fdic.gov
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency — All Appropriate Inquiries. epa.gov