Employment

Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements: What's Enforceable

An employer and employee reviewing a non-compete agreement.
Conor Meyers, Business Attorney at Clark Meyers PC
Conor Meyers — Co-Founder & Business AttorneyHas built and run businesses; advises owners on contracts, transactions, and risk. About Conor →

Quick Answer

Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements restrict what a departing employee can do afterward. Their enforceability varies significantly by state and has been changing rapidly, with growing restrictions on non-competes. Because the law is in flux and jurisdiction-specific, current local law must be confirmed before relying on — or signing — one of these agreements.

A non-compete is only worth the paper it's on if it's enforceable where you are — and that's a moving target.

Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements are common tools for protecting a business when employees leave — but their enforceability is one of the fastest-changing areas of employment law. What’s enforceable varies dramatically by state, and the trend has been toward greater restriction, especially of non-competes. A business relying on an agreement that isn’t enforceable where it operates has little real protection. This guide explains how these agreements work and why confirming current local law is essential. Given how quickly this area is evolving, it’s general information, not a substitute for current, jurisdiction-specific advice.

We help businesses get this right from the start. This is general information, not advice on a specific situation.
Problem

Relying on a boilerplate non-compete

An agreement that’s unenforceable where you are gives you protection on paper only.

Solution

Check current, local law

Confirm what’s enforceable in your jurisdiction now, and tailor the agreement accordingly.

Resolution

Protection that holds

You rely on restrictions that are actually enforceable — or use alternatives that are.

A non-compete is only worth it if it’s enforceable where you are — and that’s a moving target.

What these agreements do

Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements restrict a departing employee’s post-employment conduct. A non-compete limits the employee’s ability to work for competitors or start a competing business, usually within a defined scope, time, and geography. A non-solicitation agreement is narrower, restricting the employee from soliciting the business’s customers or employees. As the Legal Information Institute’s overview of the law.cornell.edu reflects, these are restraints on a person’s ability to work, which is why courts scrutinize them. They aim to protect legitimate business interests — trade secrets, customer relationships, investment in the employee — but that protection depends entirely on enforceability.

The trend is toward restricting non-competes; yesterday’s rule may not be today’s.

Enforceability varies and is changing fast

The central reality of these agreements is that their enforceability varies dramatically by jurisdiction and has been changing rapidly. Some states enforce reasonable non-competes; others heavily restrict or largely prohibit them, and the clear trend has been toward greater restriction, with significant legal and regulatory developments in recent years. Because this area is evolving quickly and my general knowledge may not reflect the latest changes, the enforceability of a non-compete where you operate must be confirmed against current local law before you rely on it. Treating a non-compete as automatically enforceable is a serious and increasingly common mistake.

Assumed vs. confirmed enforceability
Illustrative — not a measured statistic.
AssumedPaper only
ConfirmedReal

What courts look at where they're allowed

In jurisdictions that do enforce these agreements, courts typically require them to be reasonable — protecting a legitimate business interest, and no broader than necessary in scope, duration, and geography. An overbroad non-compete may be struck down or narrowed even where such agreements are generally permitted. Non-solicitation agreements, being narrower, are often more readily enforced than full non-competes. The requirement of reasonableness means these agreements must be carefully tailored, not copied as broad boilerplate. But reasonableness only matters in places that enforce them at all — which is why confirming local law comes first.

Alternatives and getting current advice

Because non-compete enforceability is uncertain and shrinking in many places, businesses should consider alternatives that protect legitimate interests more reliably: robust confidentiality and trade-secret protections, narrower non-solicitation agreements, and strong IP assignment. These often protect the underlying interests — confidential information and customer relationships — more durably than a non-compete that may not hold up. Given how fast this area is changing and how much it varies by location, both employers relying on these agreements and employees asked to sign them should confirm current, jurisdiction-specific law with counsel rather than assuming what was true before still holds today.

A simple plan to get a legal partner in your corner

An attorney assessing the enforceability of a non-compete.

A short conversation early helps you make the right call and keep moving with confidence.

1

Book your free legal-strategy call

We assess your situation, map a clear path forward, and discuss costs upfront.

2

Have a legal partner in your corner

We handle contracts, compliance, negotiations, and risk so you always know you're protected.

3

Enjoy real peace of mind

With the legal side handled, you focus on growing your business and the life outside of it.

The engagement at a glance

A three-step path from first call to ongoing protection.

1. Free call2. Partner on call3. Peace of mind

Relying on — or asked to sign — a non-compete?

Book a free call. We'll assess what's actually enforceable under current local law.

Book Your Free Legal-Strategy Call

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a non-compete and a non-solicitation agreement?
A non-compete restricts a departing employee from working for competitors or starting a competing business, typically within a defined scope, time period, and geographic area. A non-solicitation agreement is narrower: it restricts the employee from soliciting the business’s customers, clients, or employees, without broadly barring them from competing. Because a non-solicitation agreement is less restrictive of a person’s ability to earn a living, it is often more readily enforced than a full non-compete. Both aim to protect legitimate business interests, but they differ significantly in breadth — and therefore in how courts treat them.
Are non-competes enforceable?
It depends heavily on where you are, and the answer is changing rapidly. Enforceability varies dramatically by jurisdiction — some places enforce reasonable non-competes, while others heavily restrict or largely prohibit them — and the clear trend has been toward greater restriction, with significant recent legal and regulatory developments. Because this area is evolving quickly and is jurisdiction-specific, you cannot assume a non-compete is enforceable where you operate; it must be confirmed against current local law. Relying on a non-compete without checking its enforceability in your specific location is an increasingly risky and common mistake.
Why is non-compete law changing so much?
Non-compete law has been a very active area, with growing scrutiny of agreements that restrict workers’ mobility and earning ability. There has been significant legislative and regulatory activity aimed at limiting or restricting non-competes in various jurisdictions, reflecting policy concerns about their effects on workers and competition. The result is a fast-moving, patchwork landscape that differs by location and continues to change. Because of this volatility, any general statement about non-compete enforceability should be treated cautiously and confirmed against the current law where you operate — which is exactly why current, local legal advice is important here.
What makes a non-compete enforceable where they're allowed?
In jurisdictions that enforce them, courts generally require the agreement to be reasonable: it must protect a legitimate business interest (such as trade secrets or customer relationships) and be no broader than necessary in scope of activity, duration, and geographic area. An overbroad non-compete may be struck down or narrowed by a court even where such agreements are permitted. Some jurisdictions impose additional requirements. This reasonableness standard means non-competes must be carefully tailored rather than drafted as broad boilerplate — but it only comes into play in places that enforce these agreements at all.
What are alternatives to a non-compete?
Because non-compete enforceability is uncertain and increasingly limited, businesses often protect their interests through alternatives: strong confidentiality and trade-secret protections (guarding the actual information), non-solicitation agreements (protecting customer and employee relationships, and often more enforceable), and robust intellectual property assignment provisions. These tools frequently protect the underlying interests — confidential information and key relationships — more reliably than a non-compete that may not be enforceable. Considering these alternatives is especially wise in jurisdictions that restrict non-competes, and they can complement each other as a more durable protection strategy for the business.
Should I sign a non-compete my employer is asking for?
Before signing, it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to and whether it’s likely enforceable where you are — which, given how much this area varies and is changing, isn’t always obvious. A non-compete can meaningfully restrict your future ability to work in your field, so its scope, duration, and geographic reach matter, as does whether your jurisdiction enforces such agreements. Because the stakes for your career can be significant and the law is jurisdiction-specific and evolving, having the agreement reviewed by counsel before signing — to understand its real effect and enforceability — is a prudent step.
How can Clark Meyers help with non-compete and non-solicitation agreements?
We help both employers and employees navigate these agreements under current, local law: assessing whether a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement is likely enforceable where you operate, drafting reasonable and tailored agreements for employers where they’re permitted, advising on more reliable alternatives like confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions, and counseling employees asked to sign. Because this area is changing fast and varies by jurisdiction, we focus on current law rather than assumptions. The goal is protection that actually holds — or clarity about what you’re signing. The first step is a conversation about your situation.

Sources

  1. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law — Non-Compete Clause. law.cornell.edu
  2. U.S. Department of Labor — Wages and the Fair Labor Standards Act. dol.gov
  3. U.S. Small Business Administration — Hire and Manage Employees. sba.gov

Stop reacting to legal problems. Start preventing them.

You deserve a legal partner who helps you see what’s coming before it becomes a problem. Let’s talk.

Book Your Free Legal-Strategy CallOr call 855-208-2049
AI Assistant Online

Schedule a Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.

Request Sent!

We've received your request and will be in touch within 24 hours.

Something went wrong