Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements: What's Enforceable

Quick Answer
Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements restrict what a departing employee can do afterward. Their enforceability varies significantly by state and has been changing rapidly, with growing restrictions on non-competes. Because the law is in flux and jurisdiction-specific, current local law must be confirmed before relying on — or signing — one of these agreements.
A non-compete is only worth the paper it's on if it's enforceable where you are — and that's a moving target.
Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements are common tools for protecting a business when employees leave — but their enforceability is one of the fastest-changing areas of employment law. What’s enforceable varies dramatically by state, and the trend has been toward greater restriction, especially of non-competes. A business relying on an agreement that isn’t enforceable where it operates has little real protection. This guide explains how these agreements work and why confirming current local law is essential. Given how quickly this area is evolving, it’s general information, not a substitute for current, jurisdiction-specific advice.
We help businesses get this right from the start. This is general information, not advice on a specific situation.
Relying on a boilerplate non-compete
An agreement that’s unenforceable where you are gives you protection on paper only.
Check current, local law
Confirm what’s enforceable in your jurisdiction now, and tailor the agreement accordingly.
Protection that holds
You rely on restrictions that are actually enforceable — or use alternatives that are.
A non-compete is only worth it if it’s enforceable where you are — and that’s a moving target.
What these agreements do
Non-compete and non-solicitation agreements restrict a departing employee’s post-employment conduct. A non-compete limits the employee’s ability to work for competitors or start a competing business, usually within a defined scope, time, and geography. A non-solicitation agreement is narrower, restricting the employee from soliciting the business’s customers or employees. As the Legal Information Institute’s overview of the law.cornell.edu reflects, these are restraints on a person’s ability to work, which is why courts scrutinize them. They aim to protect legitimate business interests — trade secrets, customer relationships, investment in the employee — but that protection depends entirely on enforceability.
The trend is toward restricting non-competes; yesterday’s rule may not be today’s.
Enforceability varies and is changing fast
The central reality of these agreements is that their enforceability varies dramatically by jurisdiction and has been changing rapidly. Some states enforce reasonable non-competes; others heavily restrict or largely prohibit them, and the clear trend has been toward greater restriction, with significant legal and regulatory developments in recent years. Because this area is evolving quickly and my general knowledge may not reflect the latest changes, the enforceability of a non-compete where you operate must be confirmed against current local law before you rely on it. Treating a non-compete as automatically enforceable is a serious and increasingly common mistake.
What courts look at where they're allowed
In jurisdictions that do enforce these agreements, courts typically require them to be reasonable — protecting a legitimate business interest, and no broader than necessary in scope, duration, and geography. An overbroad non-compete may be struck down or narrowed even where such agreements are generally permitted. Non-solicitation agreements, being narrower, are often more readily enforced than full non-competes. The requirement of reasonableness means these agreements must be carefully tailored, not copied as broad boilerplate. But reasonableness only matters in places that enforce them at all — which is why confirming local law comes first.
Alternatives and getting current advice
Because non-compete enforceability is uncertain and shrinking in many places, businesses should consider alternatives that protect legitimate interests more reliably: robust confidentiality and trade-secret protections, narrower non-solicitation agreements, and strong IP assignment. These often protect the underlying interests — confidential information and customer relationships — more durably than a non-compete that may not hold up. Given how fast this area is changing and how much it varies by location, both employers relying on these agreements and employees asked to sign them should confirm current, jurisdiction-specific law with counsel rather than assuming what was true before still holds today.
A simple plan to get a legal partner in your corner

A short conversation early helps you make the right call and keep moving with confidence.
Book your free legal-strategy call
We assess your situation, map a clear path forward, and discuss costs upfront.
Have a legal partner in your corner
We handle contracts, compliance, negotiations, and risk so you always know you're protected.
Enjoy real peace of mind
With the legal side handled, you focus on growing your business and the life outside of it.
The engagement at a glance
A three-step path from first call to ongoing protection.
Relying on — or asked to sign — a non-compete?
Book a free call. We'll assess what's actually enforceable under current local law.
Book Your Free Legal-Strategy CallFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between a non-compete and a non-solicitation agreement?
Are non-competes enforceable?
Why is non-compete law changing so much?
What makes a non-compete enforceable where they're allowed?
What are alternatives to a non-compete?
Should I sign a non-compete my employer is asking for?
How can Clark Meyers help with non-compete and non-solicitation agreements?
Sources
- Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law — Non-Compete Clause. law.cornell.edu
- U.S. Department of Labor — Wages and the Fair Labor Standards Act. dol.gov
- U.S. Small Business Administration — Hire and Manage Employees. sba.gov
Stop reacting to legal problems. Start preventing them.
You deserve a legal partner who helps you see what’s coming before it becomes a problem. Let’s talk.
Book Your Free Legal-Strategy CallOr call 855-208-2049